Unity

Immense disappointment — for me, but I left Unity (the successor of Earthlings after a decade) after 20 minutes when I couldn’t take anymore. Horror upon horror, accompanied by exalted banalities solemnly voiced in sound clips by assorted celebrities.

Earthlings had been – and still is – immensely powerful and effective in awakening the world to the otherwise unimaginable agony inflicted on (other) animals by humans, the agony that ag-gag laws strive to hide from us. I hadn’t been able to bear watching Earthlings either, but I recognize that its graphic evidence is essential for sensitizing that vast majority of humankind who are ignorant of and insulated from the fact that such horrors are being committed, being committed everywhere, and being committed in our name, so as to feed those who crave meat and to clothe those who crave leather and fur. Earthlings was not a movie for vegans. It was a movie for creating vegans.

In the twenty minutes that I could bear of Unity, the horrors were mostly inflicted by humans on humans, in the context of war, but there were also Earthlings moments in Unity, where the human aggression was on animalls – and we could already sense that there would be more later in the film.

I left before they came. There will probably still be extracts from Unity that activists can use to inspire people to become vegan. But skip the human/human aggression. There is no horror we have inflicted on animals that we have not inflicted on humans too. The “rules” of war allow it all. But in peacetime, it is illegal to do that to people.

For animals, it’s always wartime, and they are always the helpless victims. They are all in the state of terror and despair of that indelibly soul-tormenting first scene of the calf facing and frantically, hopelessly, struggling to escape that all too narrow passageway to merciless slaughter.

The film brings us no new solution for ending human/human war, just the banal cliches we already know.

And for animals, apart from the new supply of episodes to add to the heart-convulsing Earthlings excerpts of ten years ago, this new film adds only a miscegenation of wickedness and words that form no unity: a congeries of horrors and homilies.

For me what was missing in this call for ecumenical unity among molecules, organisms, earth, planets, galaxies, and universe was the one property that distinguishes the trivial from the tragic — the property that unifies humans with the (other) animals and distinguishes both from molecules, earth, planets, galaxies – and even trees: That property is sentience, the susceptibility to suffering.

Towards other humans, we violate this property in times of war (and crime). But towards other animals we violate it at all times.

Maybe a miracle awaited those who stayed until the end. If so, maybe someone can tell me about it…

[Afterword: Friends later told me that the punchline turned out to be “Homo spiritus.” But (apart from the pedantic fact that it should have been “Homo spirans,” since the notion of “spirit” is inspired by divine incoming breath, and Homo is not the only breathing organism) even the more relevant taxonomic tag — Homo sensibilis — would have been a misnomer, because all other organisms with nervous systems are sentient, not just us. And our potential for sensitivity to their sensitivity is useless if we don’t use it.)]

Immense dĂ©ception — pour moi, mais je me suis sauvĂ© aprĂšs 20 minutes lorsque je n’en pouvais plus. Horreurs suivies d’horreurs, accompagnĂ©es de banalitĂ©s exaltĂ©es et insipides prononcĂ©es solennellement par des vedettes en clip sonore.

Earthlings avait Ă©tĂ© — et est toujours — d’une immense importance et utilitĂ© pour rĂ©veiller le monde Ă  l’agonie indicible infligĂ©e aux animaux par les humains. Je n’ai pas Ă©tĂ© capable de regarder Earthlings non plus, mais je reconnais que ces tĂ©moignages sont indispensables pour sensibiliser cette vaste majoritĂ© d’humains qui est ignorante du fait que les telles horreurs se font, se font partout, et se font pour alimenter ceux qui mangent la viande et pour vĂȘtir ceux qui portent le cuire et la fourrure. Earthlings n’était pas un film pour les vĂ©ganes. C’était un film pour crĂ©er les vĂ©ganes.

Earthlings had been — and still is — immensely important and useful for awakening people to the unspeakable agony inflicted on (other) animals by humans,

Dans les vingt minutes que j’ai pu supporter de Unity, les horreurs Ă©taient majoritairement infligĂ©es par les humains aux humains, dans le contexte belliqueux, mais il y avait aussi des moments Earthlings ou c’était les animaux qu’agressaient les humains — et on devinait dĂ©jĂ  qu’il y en aurait davantage plus tard dans le film.

J’ai quittĂ© avant. Il y aura sans doute encore des extraits de Unity que les activistes pourront utiliser pour inspirer les gens Ă  devenir vĂ©ganes. Mais sauter les aggressions humaines/humaines. Il n’y a aucune horreur qu’on inflige aux animaux qu’on n’inflige pas aux humains. Les « rĂšgles » martiales permettent tous. Mais en temps de paix, c’est interdit de faire ça aux humains.

Pour les animaux, c’est toujours la guerre, et ils sont toujours les victimes impuissantes.

Le film ne donne aucune nouvelle soution pour mettre fin aux guerres humaine/humaines, juste les clichĂ©s banals qu’on connais dĂ©ja.

Et pour les animaux, Ă  part des supplĂ©ments aux extraits dĂ©chirrants genre Earthlings, il n’y a qu’un mĂ©tissage d’exemples et de mots qui ne font aucune unitĂ©.

Pour moi ce qui manquait dans cet appel Ă  l’unitĂ© ƓcumĂ©nique des molĂ©cules, des organismes, de la terre, des planĂštes, des galaxies, de l’univers c’était la seule chose qui distingue les cas banals des cas importants, voir tragiques. C’est la propiĂ©te qui unifie les humains avec les (autres) animaux, et qui les distingue des molĂ©cules, de la terre, des planĂ©tes et des galaxies — et mĂȘme des arbres: Cette propriĂ©tĂ© est la sensibilitĂ©, la susceptibilitĂ© Ă  la souffrance.

Envers les autres humains, nous trahissons cette propriété en temps de guerre (et de crime). Mais envers les autres animaux nous la trahissons en tout temps.

Peut-ĂȘtre qu’un miracle attendait ceux qui sont restĂ©s jusqu’à la fin. Si oui, quelqu’un pourra peut-ĂȘtre me le raconter


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.