Re: Â www.nytimes.com/2018/07/17/magazine/george-soros-democrat-open-society.html
(1) George Soros has done â or tried to do â incomparably more good than harm.
(2) The hatred fomented against him is not only undeserved, but unpardonably shameful and despicable.
It cannot be left unsaid, however, in response to âif he hadnât gone after the British pound or the Thai baht, someone else would haveâ that not only can this be used as a justification for humanityâs worst sins, but he could have given the money back (as others would not have done).
As to âthe difference between my engagement in the markets, where my only interest is to get it right and make money, and my political engagement, where I stand for what I really believe inâ â this is a classical example of cognitive dissonance. Self-deprecating irony â âI was a confirmed egoist but I considered the pursuit of self-interest as too narrow a base for my rather inflated selfâ â does not resolve the profound contradiction. Neither does centrism; nor theorizing, whether by Karl Popper or by George Soros. Nor does enlightened plutocracy.
But (1) and (2) remain true. In the scheme of things, George Soros is squarely on the side of the angels, or has at least tried to be. The same cannot be said of most people with resources on the Hampton end of the human scale.