The University of Southampton

Who Would Of Thought Tiny Bubbles Could Treat Cancer?

The use of microbubbles within cancer treatment sounds comical, but these little bundles of joy can be used for a variety of medical applications. Over the last decade, these have been praised as the future of Cancer diagnosis and treatment and represent a safe and non-invasive alternative to Chemotherapy. I first heard about Microbubbles at a Workshop as part of my University, and it fascinated me that Microbubbles could kill cancer cells while sparing healthy ones, unlike Chemotherapy. This piqued my interest, which made me want to learn how they can be used to treat cancer within patients.

What are Microbubbles?

At the Workshop, I learned that Microbubbles are small bubbles (0.5–10 μm) consisting of a phospholipid outer layer and gas core and are used clinically during Ultrasound Imaging. When injected during Ultrasound Imaging, they resonate vigorously under the transducer, reflecting waves more effectively in body tissues and increasing imaging sensitivity.

[9] An image showing the structure of a microbubble responding to ultrasound waves produced by a Transducer during ultrasound scanning in Pregnancy

However, once researchers realised these bubbles could move around the body safely, drug delivery in the treatment of cancer was greatly considered.

So Why Are These Tiny Bubbles So Effective In Treating Cancer?

Currently, chemotherapy drugs are injected into the blood and destroy cancer cells, however, this can also result in the death of healthy cells, leading to shocking side effects such as nausea and hair loss.

Microbubbles, on the other hand, can target smaller doses of chemotherapy drugs to cancer cells alone due to their Phospholipid shell, preventing the damage of healthy cells, reducing side effects, allowing patients to recover quicker.

“By using microbubbles and ultrasound we can control when and where a drug gets released, and crucially also distribute it throughout a tumour”

– Oxford scientist Eleanor Stride To WIRED

[6]

However, within aggressive types of cancer, low oxygen levels in tumours cause resistance to chemotherapy drugs, so to resolve this, Microbubbles can be filled with oxygen to improve the delivery of the drug and its ability to kill more aggressive cancer cells.

I was glad to read that the use of oxygen within microbubbles has also seen some effectiveness in reducing Cancer within rats, however, this is still within the pre-clinical research stage. Overall, there is some promise, but it was shocking to read that a separate stroke study revealed safety concerns when high dosages caused haemorrhaging in two patients, showing that parameters of ultrasound radiation and the number of microbubbles when applied should be evaluated to prevent this from ever happening again.

So Microbubbles May Have The Potential To Cure Cancer?

Despite this, many reports have reported positive results within the use of Microbubbles, giving it the potential to save many lives. At first, I found it comical that Microbubbles could be used to treat cancer, but my mind has seriously changed after reading different articles and papers within this field.

I found it fascinating when Oxford scientist Dr Stride told New Scientist that “If you expose the blood-brain barrier to bubbles and ultrasound, you can temporarily and reversibly enhance its permeability, which is potentially interesting for a lot of brain treatments”, which made me believe that Microbubbles deserves further research as it may also have the potential to protect brain cells from dying. I’m excited to witness what I’ve called the ‘bubble revolution’ taking shape within the NHS, and seeing the countless lives that will be transformed thanks to this ground-breaking research.

“Combining oxygen-carrying microbubbles with ultrasound-triggered delivery to solid tumours is a novel approach to enhancing tumour oxygenation and sensitivity to radiation, and it deserves further study,”

Dr. Bernhard Eric Bernhard, Ph.D., chief of the Radiotherapy Development Branch in NCI’s Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis.

Bibliography

[1]

says CP. What are Microbubbles? [Internet]. News-Medical.net. 2018. Available from: https://www.news-medical.net/life-sciences/What-are-Microbubbles.aspx

[2]

New Portfolio. Editor’s choice: microbubbles [Internet]. Nature. 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.nature.com/collections/edfggagdej

[3]

NCI Staff. Using Oxygen “Microbubbles” To Improve Radiation Therapy – National Cancer Institute [Internet]. www.cancer.gov. 2018. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/cancer-currents-blog/2018/microbubbles-radiation-breast-cancer

[4]

Medeiros J. Using microbubbles to target cancer tumors [Internet]. WIRED. 2017 [cited 2025 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.wired.com/story/cancer-bubble/

[5]

Hu Q, Zhang Y, Fu L, Xi Y, Ye L, Yang X, et al. Progress and preclinical application status of ultrasound microbubbles. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology [Internet]. 2024 Feb [cited 2024 Oct 2];92:105312. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1773224723011644

[6]

Leeds Alumini. Microbubbles Animation [Internet]. Youtu.be. 2025 [cited 2025 Mar 27]. Available from: https://youtu.be/vXjeJQy6V_M?si=fJBXRXIMWAt58_sf

[7]

Spencer B. The tiny bubbles filled with drugs that could transform cancer treatment [Internet]. Mail Online. Daily Mail; 2015 [cited 2025 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3123944/The-tiny-bubbles-filled-drugs-transform-cancer-treatment-Findings-reduce-effects-chemotherapy.html

[8]

Macrae F. Bubbles “could deliver stroke drugs directly to the brain” [Internet]. Mail Online. Daily Mail; 2010 [cited 2025 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1328644/Bubbles-deliver-stroke-drugs-directly-brain.html

[9]

Rumney R. Workshop – Stem cell regenerative medicine – Robin Rumney [Internet]. Blackboard. 2025 [cited 2025 Mar 27]. Available from: https://blackboard.soton.ac.uk/ultra/courses/_228111_1/outline/edit/document/_7135192_1?courseId=_228111_1&view=content&state=view

The 14-Day Rule: Why Science May Have Outgrown Its Most Sacred Limit

What are embryonic stem cells and what can they be used for?

An embryonic stem cell is a specialised stem cell derived from the early stages of an embryo, which is capable of differentiating into any type of body cell.  These stem cells have pluripotent properties, allowing them to develop into almost any cell type in the body, giving embryonic stem cells potential medical applications in regenerative medicine. In theory, these cells could be used to create whole new organs, potentially allowing embryonic stem cells to cure blindness, replace damaged tissue in spinal injuries and more!

The use of embryonic stem cells raises human life considerations, as their creation requires embryo destruction. This raises questions about when human life begins and its moral status, leading to the formation of the 14-day rule in response to these ethical concerns.

What is the 14 day rule ?

The rise of interest in the potential of embryonic stem cells began when Louise Brown, the first human born from in vitro fertilization (IVF), was born on July 25, 1978.

‘These spare embryos can be very useful … they can teach us things about early human life’

Robert Edwards, 1982

The UK Government established the Warnock Committee in 1982 under Dame Mary Warnock’s chairmanship to set boundaries for embryo research and medical practice. The committee took a pragmatic approach, focusing on political consensus rather than moral absolutes.

This framework led to the 14-day rule, which marks the period before primitive streak formation and the stage when twinning becomes impossible. However, this was done to bring ease to the public, rather than establish moral boundaries.

“The requirement for precision of setting a limit on embryo testing was not primarily based on scientific or philosophical reasons, but to “allay public anxiety”.

Warnock Report [11.19]

However, at the time, maintaining embryos alive in vitro beyond 14 days seemed technically impossible, making it a convenient limit for research, meaning that the rule was initially based on technical limitations rather than ethical considerations.

What are some of the modern lab techniques that have challenged the 14-day rule?

Modern laboratory techniques have challenged the traditional 14-day rule through groundbreaking developments. Among these, Stem Cell-Derived Gametes (SCDGs) represent a significant advancement in reproductive biology, enabling scientists to create egg and sperm cells from stem cells in laboratory settings. This technology opens new possibilities for fertility treatment, potentially allowing prospective parents with infertility and same-sex couples to have genetically related children.

The development of SCDGs has become particularly significant for embryonic research, providing an alternative to traditional embryo sources and helping establish the safety and efficacy of new reproductive technologies while bypassing ethical issues.

So Should We Protect Human Life Before 14 Days?

The question of whether human life should be protected before 14 days raises fundamental moral and ethical considerations as Human embryos possess inherent dignity and moral value from conception, and their destruction at any stage constitutes a serious ethical violation.

However, the 14-day rule arbitrarily distinguishes between equally valuable human lives, highlighting the need for consistent ethical standards. Modern imaging techniques and Stem Cell-Derived Gametes (SCDGs) now allow for detailed study without destructive research. The ethical implications of reducing the limit would further devalue early human life, while current restrictions protect vulnerable human beings and maintain fundamental human rights principles.

Bibliography

1.

What are stem cells? – Craig A. Kohn [Internet]. YouTube. 2013. Available from: https://youtu.be/evH0I7Coc54

2.

Appleby JB, Bredenoord AL. Should the 14‐day rule for embryo research become the 28‐day rule? EMBO Molecular Medicine. 2018 Aug 7;10(9):e9437.

3.

Jones DA. The injustice of destroying embryonic human beings [Internet]. Mercator. 2016 [cited 2025 Mar 11]. Available from: https://www.mercatornet.com/the-injustice-of-destroying-embryonic-human-beings

4.

Staff C. Bioethicists deplore relaxation of 14-day limit on human embryo research [Internet]. Catholic News Agency. 2021 [cited 2025 Mar 11]. Available from: https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/247880/bioethicists-deplore-relaxation-of-14-day-limit-on-human-embryo-research

5.

Buckley G. Embryonic Stem Cell – Definition and Uses | Biology Dictionary [Internet]. Biology Dictionary. 2019. Available from: https://biologydictionary.net/embryonic-stem-cell/

6.

Wikipedia Contributors. Louise Brown [Internet]. Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation; 2019. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_Brown

7.

Dawson J. Stem cell research – ethics & law. 2025.