The University of Southampton

A Heart Alternative – How Far Can We Go?

Blog audio transcript:

Following the anatomy lab visit and lectures on stem cells, tissue engineering and prosthetics, it made me think about how far we can go towards developing an organ from a non-human origin. The heart stood out as one that could be in the realms of possibility compared to some of the more complex organs.

A labelled Diagram of the Internal Anatomy of the Heart
A Labelled Diagram of the Internal Anatomy of the Heart. Available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2008_Internal_Anatomy_of_the_HeartN.jpg (Accessed: 25/02/2025). By OpenStax College, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license from Wikimedia Commons.

Genetically modified pig heart transplants have been carried out, with the first transplant performed in 2022 on a 57-year-old individual with end stage heart failure. This operation, formally called xenotransplantation, worked well for seven weeks, however the patient passed with heart failure after this time. It was found that the heart was vulnerable to rejection, it also contained traces of a virus that infects pigs.

A BBC Video Reporting on the First Patient to Receive a Pig Heart Transplant (Accessed: 23/02/2025). Captions are available on this video.

There is a very good reflective article linked here which talks about where to go after this xenotransplantation was carried out. Feel free to have a look if you are interested in reading more.

This transplant brings up ethical points to consider along with scientific challenges:

  • To what extent is it right to sacrifice animals for the benefit of humankind? Applying ethical concepts, most people would say more good is done by saving a human life than by sacrificing an animal such as a pig. Furthermore, if a pig could be genetically modified to become more humanised in the future, then perhaps more than one human life could be saved for each pig. Provided that the pig is well cared for during its lifetime, then this action of using its tissue would overall be deemed as “good” and the “right” action.
  • Scientific problems can happen during any transplantation. Specifically for pig heart xenotransplantation, immediate and acute rejection of the tissue can be an issue. Thrombosis, blood clots, can also occur due to a haematological incompatibility.

This video summarises the scientific and ethical implications of xenotransplantation:

An Interview Discussing the Scientific and Ethical Challenges Around Xenotransplantation (Accessed: 23/02/2025). Captions are available on this video.

A recent BBC article published in January 2025 highlighted work done in Germany where stem cells were used to develop patches of heart muscle cells which were then grafted onto damaged tissue. This could help patients with heart failure, giving encouraging results in trials.

A Screenshot of a BBC Article Titled “Scientists trial patch to mend failing hearts”
A Screenshot of a BBC Article Titled “Scientists trial patch to mend failing hearts”. Available to read at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgkjnl0dve8o (Accessed: 24/02/2025).

From a societal perspective, most of these developments on repairing heart tissue are novel. A high element of risk is not always worth it; however, it might be for those who have little or no alternative.

It is not uncommon to regularly come across news stories regarding the organ shortage. The UK organ donation law changed in May 2020 to an opt-out system meaning that by default adults are considered as potential donors.

In my view the moral status of a human life outweighs the sacrifice of an animal such as a pig. Scientific advance in this area should be encouraged within the framework of ethical boundaries. I cannot find a meaningful downside to pursue alternative methods of sourcing valuable organs.

Stem Cells and Parkinson’s: A New Hope for Treatment?

Parkinson’s disease is a neurogenerative disorder caused by the loss of nerve cells in a part of the brain called substantia nigra. Losing these cells causes a drop in the abundance of a vital chemical called dopamine, leading to a whole host of symptoms, including tremors, stiffness, and dementia. Parkinson’s disease can also strongly impact the mental health of affected people, often associated with depression and anxiety.

This disease is common, affecting more than 1 in 50 people over the age of 65, with some people even experiencing symptoms under 40 years old. The cause of the degeneration of specific nerve cells associated with Parkinson’s disease is unknown, but there is evidence for some new approaches for its treatment using stem cells.

How could stem cells be used?

First, what are stem cells? There are a few kinds of stem cell, but the term generally refers to cells that are capable of developing into other types of cell. Embryonic stem cells, in particular, are pluripotent, meaning they can give rise to all cell types. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which also differentiate into any cell type, can be created via the reprogramming of existing adult cells. Of all stem cells available, these two seem to be the most promising.

One major therapy which has the potential to treat Parkinson’s disease is “Bemdaneprocel”, or “BRT-DA01”. In this therapy, human embryonic stem cells are converted into dopamine-producing neuron progenitors in the lab before being surgically implanted into a specific area of the brain. These cells may be recognised as foreign, so patients must take immunosuppressants for a year. This method began a Phase 1 trial in 2021. “BRT-DA01” showed high safety and potential clinical benefits, and is expected to undergo a Phase 3 trial in the first half of this year.

Another experimental therapy for Parkinson’s disease which aims to replace lost dopaminergic neurons was approved for a Phase 1/2a trial in the US by the FDA in late 2023. In this method (“ANPD001”), skin cells are collected from a patient and reprogrammed in the lab, producing iPSCs which are then converted into immature dopamine neuronal precursor cells. Finally, they are transplanted into the brain, in the hope that they will develop into those crucial neurons. One key advantage of “ANPD001” over “BRT-DA01” is that iPSCs are derived from the patient, so immunosuppressants aren’t needed. As of January this year, this method has been safely carried out with two patient cohorts.

Some ethical issues

While embryonic stem cells may be an effective source for the treatment of Parkinson’s, testing and using them for science raises some interesting ethical questions. These cells are derived from early-stage embryos, in a process involving the destruction of the embryo. The moral status of the embryo in comparison to human life therefore must be questioned. Furthermore, embryos used for scientific purposes are often donated by people undergoing in vitro fertilisation. I feel it is crucial that donors are entirely aware of how their embryos will be used, and clear consent is given.

This is obviously a difficult ethical dilemma, though there seems to be a work-around. Fortunately, iPSCs avoid the ethical questions faced by embryonic stem cells, because they are not derived from embryos. As a result, these cells seem to be a far more acceptable choice for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, especially from the standpoint of public concern.

Hello!

Inspector gadget is the first thing that comes to my mind when thinking about this module. I’m exited to learn about the ‘gadgets’ that can be made to help people!

UOSM2031 Introduction Blog

Hi! I am Leah Berry, a second year studying biology. I am really excited to start this module, especially the cochlear implants topic and the more practical, creative elements!

This is some example text.

Below is an image of the internal and external overview of how cochlear implants work.

This is a TED talk on cochlear implants that explores the significance of cochlear implants in improving the lives of those living with deafness.