{"id":538,"date":"2021-02-03T17:52:03","date_gmt":"2021-02-03T17:52:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/?p=538"},"modified":"2024-08-31T17:05:52","modified_gmt":"2024-08-31T16:05:52","slug":"reflections-on-teaching-in-the-age-of-covid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/2021\/02\/03\/reflections-on-teaching-in-the-age-of-covid\/","title":{"rendered":"Reflections on teaching in the age of COVID"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Dr George Gilbert<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wholly or mostly online teaching throughout the academic year 2020-21 has been forced upon us as a result of a global pandemic, and not something any academic working in higher education chose willingly. It has meant in many cases quite radical reshaping of longstanding and more recent modules, and, to such an extent, quite substantially redesigning a well-established and (one would hope) fairly effective history curriculum.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As a lecturer in modern Russian history teaching at the University of Southampton since 2015, the pedagogical and intellectual challenges this year have been quite profound and unlike anything I have experienced before. As I write this blog post our second term is soon to begin and like many of my colleagues, I am scrambling to prepare numerous Blackboard sites with new teaching materials \u2013 this coming term I will be involved in no fewer than five modules, delivered from the second year of undergraduate study through to masters\u2019 level. It\u2019s not been an easy task, and it\u2019s certainly a labour-intensive one. However, the current year has also presented some unexpected opportunities, which I will explore below. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
The modern workplace. Photo courtesy of George Gilbert<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

A secondary reason for writing this is that an academic on the front line, I feel it is necessary to defend online teaching due to many of the narratives circulating in the national media. These flames are being eagerly and sometimes perhaps unwittingly fanned by online political voices far removed from the realities of present-day university teaching who assert that online teaching is but a poor substitute for the \u2018real thing\u2019.

Indeed, there are disadvantages to teaching wholly or partially online, and some parts of the \u2018student experience\u2019 have certainly suffered. But it is uncritical to suggest that everything<\/em> is worse as a result. In fact, there are a few items we might learn from from this year of rapid change and flux. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

First, the move to remote teaching has allowed many of us to reshape the intellectual content we deliver and think of new ways of teaching our material. For myself, this has meant revising my two-year-old module Political Cultures in Modern Russia<\/em> \u2013 a year-long special subject which covers the period from approximately the late nineteenth century to just after World War Two \u2013 into something that is qualitatively different in both its intellectual focus and delivery. Like many of my colleagues, I have combined an existing module with that of another specialist working at the university; in my case, that of my colleague Professor Mark Cornwall, a specialist in East-Central Europe, who teaches a module on the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Our two modules collectively address some of the key areas of investigation from the period from 1900-1918 that have long (and more recently) vexed historians. These include traditional \u2018big questions\u2019 as well as comparatively novel avenues of historical investigation surrounding war, crises, shifting identities and changing political cultures.

The result is a new module Empires in Crisis? The Austro-Hungarian and Russian Revolutions, 1900-1918<\/em> that speaks to many of the themes that interest us both. As a year-long special subject it\u2019s delivered in two parts, with part one exploring domestic crisis \u2013 discussions of conservative anxiety under the old regimes, the \u2018failed\u2019 revolution of 1905 in Russia, parliamentary politics in both empires and vexed issues of identity which surround nationality, gender, race and sex. Part two looks outwards at entanglements between the two powers and others, and is focused on foreign policy, war and revolution. Both parts are delivered wholly by way of seminars, with \u2018lectures\u2019 restricted to introductory and concluding videos that we release on the Blackboard sites week to week. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"

Map of military alliances of Europe in 1914, via https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Map_Europe_alliances_1914-en.svg<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This has led to a substantial rethinking of the ways in which I teach my era, which I will doubtless apply in next year\u2019s teaching or after. It\u2019s allowed both of us to engage with the most recent historiography, handing students a clear map of how our subjects have evolved, from which they can ask themselves fresh questions about how and why fields change over time.

To provide one example, World War One was for a long time obscured in the historiography of late imperial Russia by a close focus on the revolutions of 1917. New archival discoveries have complemented political transformation in Russia itself in inspiring a shift to look at the previously \u2018forgotten\u2019 war of 1914-17, which for so long was firmly in the shadow of \u2018glorious October\u2019. Incorporating new essays and books published from the 1990s to the last few months, the module handbook could only have been a product of 2021. Students will no doubt notice the dates of many of the publications and the lopsided nature of the topics, and can ask themselves questions of historiographical import about why fields change. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further to this, thinking through themes of national identity, empire, class (and so on) have allowed us to draw comparisons that prompt us to think about shared histories in new ways. The two historiographies complement one another nicely here, providing several points of contrast as well as concordance. Some questions include: Why did Russia see comparatively more violence than Austria-Hungary from 1903-6? Why did parliamentary regimes in both cases fail to deliver on their promises in the early twentieth century? Did Franz Joseph have a better idea of how to manage political turbulence than Nicholas II? Given part two looks directly at foreign policy, it\u2019s notable that both empires came together in agreement at times but more commonly clashed in conflict, with the result that the road to World War One as explored from both perspectives plays a leading role in the first half of the second part of the module. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Histories of course change over time as scholars rewrite the past and address new questions even as they approach older questions in new ways. Over the past several decades there\u2019s been a notable advancement in the historiographies of both the Russian and Austro-Hungarian empires to address questions of \u2018periphery\u2019 as well as \u2018centre\u2019, and the diverse nationalities within both polities have prompted us to think through some of the related questions. My own views of impressing on students the importance of understanding national diversity in the Russian empire \u2013 following on from the likes of Andreas Kappeler and his studies, to name but one \u2013 have shifted as a result, and I believe more than ever it\u2019s key to understanding why Russia\u2019s rulers acted in the ways that they did. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Nicholas II and family in a formal photograph, taken for the occasion of Tsarevich Alexei’s Christening, c. 1904. https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Nicholas_II_of_Russia#\/media\/File:1904-1905peterhof.jpg<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Many shared questions apply themselves to both of our historiographies. Both empires were dynastic; both were largely (or wholly) land-based; both had conservative interests guiding them, and both were worried by the spectre of revolution \u2013 in the case of Russia, by liberalism and increasingly the revolutionary left after 1905. Though there were numerous points of disagreement. Franz Joseph got a generally more sympathetic airing from students than Nicholas II in the first part of the module \u2013 the shared histories can provide us for points of comparative reflection. A guiding question has been which ruling structure managed change better as centrifugal and centripetal forces pulled at the seams. The \u2018optimistic\u2019 and \u2018pessimistic\u2019 schools are of course well-worn, but looking at newer areas of investigation surrounding gender, sex and cultural conflict can help inject new life into the question of whether these empires were indeed doomed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Statue of Kaiser Franz Joseph-Denkmal at Burggarten. https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Emperor_Franz_Joseph_I_monument_(Burggarten).jpg<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The pedagogical aspects of online teaching also deserve some comment. As a joint special subject, both Mark and I attend every session together: the opportunity to use the technology to provide shared sessions where we communicate directly with one another as well as our students has been commented upon positively in teaching feedback. In addition to pre-recording short (10-15 minute) summaries of the main themes to be tackled in any given session, every week we provide a \u2018wrap up\u2019 video of around 10-15 minutes \u2013 though sometimes longer \u2013 where we respond to student engagement as well as the week\u2019s set questions. We usually start by assessing a few topics that the students tended to bring up themselves, and therefore actively engage with their ideas. We also answer each other\u2019s questions where possible. Then, at the end, we throw in a connection or two to the following week\u2019s theme, if possible. At Southampton we teach the special subject for four hours a week in two two-hour sessions. Combined with the introduction and wrap-up videos the sessions come thick and fast and the result is undoubtedly labour-intensive, but it does provide for points of commonality in the two historical case studies to be sketched immediately, as well as to engage instinctively with one another as well as student comment and feedback on the sessions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not everything has worked perfectly: technology has of course provided for a few glitches, and there are certainly students who prefer the \u2018in-person\u2019 experience of teaching. The speed of teaching and production of materials has led to a dizzying and relentless feel to the term which will doubtless continue for the remainder of the year, and it seems more work is needed to make online seminars adequate, let alone excellent, than the in-person type.

But there are also many positives. One of these is that there is much scope to instantly share materials \u2013 the \u2018chat\u2019 function in collaborate (also in MS Teams) makes sharing links to online materials, PDFs and so on a doddle, and the same function also provides those who would rather communicate with us by way of written comments rather than direct speech an additional medium. There is certainly a type of student who prefers online learning: in my own anecdotal experience, sometimes shy students who do not have ready experience of speaking in front of groups (and might find this a daunting prospect in any case) are finding the format generally a little more accessible and less onerous than the \u2018real world\u2019 variant. We should remember that experiences of teaching in different environments vary widely: not everyone finds it easy or comfortable to study or teach from a home environment, so we should be wary of adopting a one size fits all model (to address press comment, including online: bad; in person: good) as a result of mixed experiences of different formats. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Once this year of total chaos is over there will be lessons to be learned here, both positive and negative. It would be wrong to throw out the baby with the bathwater \u2013 there is much to say about our shared experiences, much of it useful, and this can be applied to our pedagogy going forward. I have no interest in going back wholly to the \u2018way things were\u2019 and wish to apply my experiences from 2020-21 to a different teaching style in the future, as well as think through my subject in new and challenging ways. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

21 January 2021<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dr George Gilbert Wholly or mostly online teaching throughout the academic year 2020-21 has been forced upon us as a result of a global pandemic, and not something any academic working in higher education chose willingly. It has meant in many cases quite radical reshaping of longstanding and more recent modules, and, to such an extent, quite substantially redesigning a …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3768,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[115,116,113],"class_list":["post-538","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-comment-and-debate","tag-covid","tag-modern-russian-history","tag-remote","column","threecol"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9DnLX-8G","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":545,"url":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/2021\/02\/04\/teaching-in-an-age-of-covid\/","url_meta":{"origin":538,"position":0},"title":"Teaching in an Age of COVID","author":"Jonathan Hunt","date":"4th February 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Professor Neil Gregor Avenue Campus, where single and dual honours History students once congregated en masse. This year has brought its challenges for tutors and students alike.\u00a0 But the need to rethink how we deliver our teaching has also brought its advantages. These are not only practical \u2013 they have\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Comment and debate"","block_context":{"text":"Comment and debate","link":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/category\/comment-and-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/236\/2021\/02\/Dr-Joan-Tumblety.jpg_SIA_JPG_fit_to_width_INLINE.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":532,"url":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/2021\/01\/07\/edgar-feuchtwanger-obe\/","url_meta":{"origin":538,"position":1},"title":"Edgar Feuchtwanger, OBE","author":"Jonathan Hunt","date":"7th January 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"By Tony Kushner The History Department and the Parkes Institute are delighted to share the good news that Edgar Feuchtwanger has been awarded an OBE in the 2021 Queen\u2019s Honours \u00a0List for services to \u2018Anglo-German understanding and history\u2019. Edgar, who was born in Munich in 1924 into a distinguished German\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Notes from the archive"","block_context":{"text":"Notes from the archive","link":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/category\/notes-from-the-archive\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/236\/2021\/01\/Edgar-and-Neil-72.jpg_SIA_JPG_fit_to_width_INLINE.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":64,"url":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/2018\/01\/31\/staff-qa-alan-ross\/","url_meta":{"origin":538,"position":2},"title":"Staff Q&A: Alan Ross","author":"George Gilbert","date":"31st January 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Today, we have another interview, this time with Dr Alan Ross. History at Southampton: How would you describe yourself as a historian? Alan Ross: I tend to think of myself as a traditional Classicist: I use detailed linguistic and textual interrogation of ancient authors to answer literary, philosophical, and historical\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Meet the Department"","block_context":{"text":"Meet the Department","link":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/category\/meet-the-department\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":887,"url":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/2025\/11\/25\/ancient-history-seminar-with-josephine-quinn\/","url_meta":{"origin":538,"position":3},"title":"Ancient History Seminar with Josephine Quinn","author":"Craig Lambert","date":"25th November 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Dr Annelies Cazemier On Wednesday 5th November 2025, Professor Josephine Quinn spoke to our Departmental research seminar about her book, How the World Made the West. It has received rave reviews and was described by William Dalrymple (among others) as \u2018one of the most fascinating and important works of global\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Notes from the archive"","block_context":{"text":"Notes from the archive","link":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/category\/notes-from-the-archive\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/236\/2025\/11\/Quinn-Cover-9781526605184-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/236\/2025\/11\/Quinn-Cover-9781526605184-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/236\/2025\/11\/Quinn-Cover-9781526605184-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/236\/2025\/11\/Quinn-Cover-9781526605184-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494,"url":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/2020\/02\/18\/holocaust-memorial-day-27-january-2020\/","url_meta":{"origin":538,"position":4},"title":"Holocaust Memorial Day, 27 January 2020","author":"Jonathan Hunt","date":"18th February 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Holocaust Memorial Day, 27 January 2020 By Dr George Gilbert It is more or less impossible to fully understand the course of the twentieth century without reference to the Holocaust. For good reasons, this human tragedy has come to dominate the historiography of genocides across vast stretches of time and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Notes from the archive"","block_context":{"text":"Notes from the archive","link":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/category\/notes-from-the-archive\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":290,"url":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/2018\/10\/23\/world-war-one-student-protests-in-china-and-the-foundation-of-the-chinese-communist-party\/","url_meta":{"origin":538,"position":5},"title":"World War One, Student Protests in China and the Foundation of the Chinese Communist Party","author":"Eve Colpus","date":"23rd October 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Within the centenary commemorations of the First World War, one history-making aspect that is often overlooked is what the war had to do with the foundation by young Chinese intellectuals of the Chinese Communist Party, the party that continues to govern China today. In this Blog post, Elisabeth Forster discusses\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Comment and debate"","block_context":{"text":"Comment and debate","link":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/category\/comment-and-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/236\/2018\/10\/Chineselabourers-300x219.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/538","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3768"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=538"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/538\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":556,"href":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/538\/revisions\/556"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=538"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=538"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=538"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}