{"id":197,"date":"2015-10-18T22:18:22","date_gmt":"2015-10-18T21:18:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/ditchedenclosures\/?page_id=197"},"modified":"2016-06-30T18:34:12","modified_gmt":"2016-06-30T17:34:12","slug":"neolithic-banks-knap-hill","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/ditchedenclosures\/what-is-a-ditched-enclosure\/neolithic-banks-knap-hill\/","title":{"rendered":"Neolithic banks"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Avebury<\/a>
Avebury henge bank (in the foreground), as seen from the nearby causewayed enclosure at Windmill Hill (Wiltshire, United Kingdom). Cropped. Copyright \u00a9 Wikipedia user Dickbauch 2005 – Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Banks might have been the most visible and recognisable elements of Neolithic ditched enclosures in the past, but they are now gone for the most part. The most notable examples of surviving Neolithic banks are those of quite a few British henges and a small number of causewayed enclosures. Almost everywhere else banks are today absent, either because they have eroded or have been plough-levelled by modern agricultural activity, because Prehistoric peoples destoyed them intentionally (e.g. as part of abandonment rituals) or because they did not exist at all at some sites. Known banks were built with the earth extracted when digging the ditch, and where laid out in parallel to the ditch, either in the outer or in the inner side of it. The construction of the bank on the outside as opposed to the inside of the ditched circuit has been traditionally used, among other parametres, to distinguish between different types of enclosures, and are considered characteristic of certain classes (e.g. British henges, characterised by an outer bank and an inner ditch).<\/p>\n

\"Avebury<\/a>
Avebury Neolithic banks as seen from the inner area (Wiltshire, United Kingdom). Copyright \u00a9 Damian Entwistle 2011 – Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Sometimes, even if there are no physical remains of a bank, its presence and the position it occupied can be inferred from indirect evidence, like the position of other elements (ditches, palisades), in relation to each other and the topography of the site.<\/p>\n

\"Photo<\/a>
Reconstructed banks at the Circular Ditched Enclosure at Goseck (Saxony-Anhalt, Germany). Copyright \u00a9 J.L. Caro Herrero 2015 – Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

An example: Neolithic banks at Knap Hill<\/h3>\n
\"Neolithic<\/a>
Neolithic banks at Knap Hill causewayed enclosure (Wiltshire, United Kingdom). View from the NW. Copyright \u00a9 Victor Jimenez Jaimez 2015 – Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Knap Hill<\/a> is an Early Neolithic causewayed enclosure in Wiltshire (United Kingdom). Because its banks are so well preserved, it has always been visible at plain sight. That explains why there are written records of its existence as far back as the 17th century, and why it was one of the first Neolithic ditched enclosures in Europe to be excavated by archaeologists \u2013 the Cunningtons in 1908-9. It was showed then that the causeways or interruptions in the layout of the Neolithic banks ditches were not a by-product of erosion or other post-abandonment processes, but a feature.<\/p>\n

\n\n